When everyone is supervising, is anyone? More PAs listing multiple primary supervising physiciansCategories: Board News Comments: 3 comments
The Board recognizes that it may be desirable for a variety of reasons to have multiple physicians share the responsibility of acting as a midlevel practitioner’s primary supervisor. The Board does not consider this situation optimal, even if it is possible for multiple primary supervising physicians and their supervisee(s) to be in compliance with supervision rules. Designating a large number of physicians to act as primary supervisors may, in fact, prevent the midlevel practitioner from developing a meaningful clinical partnership with his or her primary supervisor(s), which is the Board’s ultimate goal.
For example, administrative rules require PAs to have detailed written scope-of-practice agreements that clearly state the medical duties and tasks to be delegated by each primary supervising physician. When a large number of primary supervising physicians take responsibility for a single PA, practices may be more inclined to use prepared, generalized documents to meet this requirement. In the Board’s view, using pro forma documents decreases the quality of the supervision because the PA and his or her primary supervisor(s) are less likely to carefully consider each practitioner’s skills, training and experience and create individualized documents that state the medical tasks that may be safely delegated.
On another note, the Board expects each primary supervising physician to hold regular, meaningful quality improvement meetings with each midlevel practitioner under his or her supervision. In an established supervisory arrangement, rules require that a PA meet with each primary supervising physician at least once every six months. A PA with 17 primary supervising physicians would need to participate in, at minimum, 34 QI meetings a year. Even if a PA could manage to attend such a large number of meetings, the Board questions whether the quality of theses interactions would meet its expectations for meaningful quality improvement.
A BETTER MODEL
There is no specific restriction that requires PAs to limit the number of physicians they designate as primary supervisors. However, the Board prefers that PAs structure their practice arrangements such that they have an opportunity to develop close working relationships with their primary supervisors. This is most likely to occur when there is one primary supervisor. In a situation where that is not feasible, the Board believes it is best when supervision is shared among the smallest number of primary supervising physicians possible. If other physicians in the practice wish to have a role in supervising midlevel practitioners, they may participate as back-up supervising physicians.
SUPERVISION REQUIREMENTS: ITEMS TO HAVE AT YOUR PRACTICE SITE
- Proof of licensure and registration
- Statement of supervisory arrangement with each primary supervising physician (This document provides a detailed description of the PA’s scope of practice)
- Signed and dated record of Quality Improvement meetings between each primary supervising MD and PA relevant to clinical problems and QI measures
- List of all back-up supervising physicians, signed and dated by MDs (primary and backups) and PA
- Written prescribing instructions to include written policy for periodic review of these instructions by each primary supervising MD
- DEA registration and pharmacy permit, if applicable
Learn more: View NCMB rules for PAs
Comments on this article:
This article could not have come at a more perfect time. I recently had this conversation with a fellow PA and advised her against this practice. Luckily, we have administration here that will back her up in making the right decision.By Shannon Heuts on Jul 23, 2011 at 9:47am
Keep it coming with the articles on PA practice….very helpful!
We used to have a designation of “Alternate Supervising Physicians” which, as I recall, was designed to include practice partners who may be available as supervisors if the primary was out of town or unavailable. Ae we still using this? It seems to me that a PA having 17 “Supervising Physicians” would have 17 different jobs. An example would be the PA who works part time in a group of ER’s as well as his primary office and perhaps an Urgent Care. He might nor work in these settings regularly but is available as alternate coverage as needed.
The concerns of the Medical Board are well taken.By Robert Hollingsworth, PA-C on Jul 23, 2011 at 12:24pm
I think the Board"s concern is justified. Many examples of multiple supervising MDs and TNTC back-up MDs are becoming common. With many practices now production and almost, if not completely,locum tenens type, multi site models, PA’s may never even work with their so called supervising MD(s). Required meetings are executed, per board requirement, but in group(mid-level) numbers-not meeting 1/1 unless there is an issue of concern. Call me “old fashioned” if you want, but this is NOT a supervising MD/PA relationship except on paper.By Linda Oliver,PA on Sep 02, 2011 at 6:59pm